Sign Up for Womenary’s short summer…
|
|
|
|
Posted in Personal, Seminars & Conferences, Uncategorized, tagged apologetics, bible teaching, womenary on May 22, 2013 | 2 Comments »
Sign Up for Womenary’s short summer…
|
|
|
|
Posted in Men / Phalanx, Personal, Random Stuff, Uncategorized on April 10, 2013 | 11 Comments »
Thoughts
I assume that for those intent on limiting legal availability to guns, it must be a moral argument. But what is it? I hope I get that feedback… if limited people’s lawful access to guns is a moral imperative to you, I would love to hear about it! I am not kidding. Remember, not pragmatic… moral.
but let me make a guess:
There are those who believe that humans are basically good… and because they are basically good, they believe that if you remove the external “evil” influences (like guns), then people will not be evil. Maybe it is simpler than evil – maybe it is just “violent”… If we take away the guns, then people will be less violent… in which case, it becomes a crusade to get rid of the evil or violent influencers.
The problem is that people are violent; more, people are evil… or at least tainted by it. Though we have a wonderful potential for goodness and greatness that I assume extends from being created in the image of God…
But we are fallen. We are bent from our original design. We are all born with the predisposition to be selfish, narcissistic liars. My children could lie before they had ever seen anyone lie – we didn’t have to teach them.
People will be violent and lethally so. Those with evil or criminal intent will accomplish these and will do it with the best weapons they can get illegally. To me it seems that for a sane society, it is vital that law abiding citizens be as well armed as criminals. This feels axiomatic to me.
Maybe this isn’t it. If someone else has another moral argument, I would love to engage with it, but I don’t think a pragmatic one is going to work… and if a pragmatic argument doesn’t work, then it isn’t sound as a pragmatic argument.
Freedom
I do have one other thought that, as an American, has struck me recently as I have watched the news on these topics that I want to make note of… Again, I don’t know if I think of government endorsed freedom as a moral issue – my freedom comes from my Creator…
But one of the things that the US was originally founded on was a transcendent concept of human freedoms… that people are, generally speaking, free to choose things (like the pursuit of happiness) on their own.
One pundit after another is asking the same question about various gun components or brands or styles: “Why do you need a __________?”
Silencer
AR-15
Extended clip
Pistol grip
Or whatever…
What troubles me is the question itself rather than the object… or even the answers.
Everyone that I have watched has been answering this question as thought it were a valid question. As an American who likes to think of this as a free country, this bothers me.
Why do you need more than 1 car?
Why do you need to watch daytime news shows?
Why do you need dessert?
Why do you need more than 1 television?
Why do you need to own movies, computers, chairs, more than a couple changes of clothes, more than one pair of shoes…?
You don’t. I don’t.
But this is a free nation, and approximates what the early founders would have believed that government was not supposed to do.
It seems to me that one application of that liberty would mean that it isn’t my responsibility to explain to the government why I want to own something… or why I need it…
Rather, it should be the government’s responsibility to go to extreme measures to make an airtight case that I shouldn’t have the freedom to own something… and I think this was a part of the argument for our national existence.
Right?
Then why are we answering those questions? I want to see an expert, pundit, or someone make this case when asked this question. Has America changed so much that we don’t even start with the assumption of freedom?
Again, this is now still not a moral argument – I don’t know that I believe that people do have a God-given right to pursue happiness… but I do know it is a principle that the nation was founded on. Interesting to me, at least, the shift in thinking.
Ok, I hope that didn’t become too political there at the end, but again, I am looking for what the moral argument might be and maybe it is about equitability. For many, fairness is a moral responsibility… maybe I can write about fairness next.
Posted in Men / Phalanx, Random Stuff, Uncategorized, tagged gun control, gun control laws, guns, morality on April 1, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
Lesson Part II – what is meant by “Pragmatic” argument?
A pragmatic argument is one that is based on effectiveness… in other words, “what works?”
So, if what is left is the pragmatic argument, what, if anything, would gun control effectively accomplish?
First, I think I will stay away from statistics, because I am not sure whose numbers to trust.
All of that in place so I can start the actual discussion! Whew.
So, I can only assume that proponents of gun control laws believe that creating laws that make owning or purchasing certain, or all, guns will make us safer… given the connection to the recent public shootings, that anti-gun laws will make things like that less likely. That only seems plausible if one of two things is true:
1. Gun laws will deter people with criminal intent from being willing to get and use guns… and/or
2. Gun laws will deter people with criminal intent from being able to get and use guns.
Again, if you believe that owning guns is morally wrong, I would love to hear about it… but if you are arguing for gun laws for practical reasons… am I missing something? Those are the only two that make sense to me.
Also, PRO gun people might add “and then you would need to show that if either of those are true, then you would additionally have to show that people without the willingness and/or the ability to get and use guns for crime are this less likely to commit the crime another way (knife, club, fists, etc.) But I am not examining that yet.
So…
1. Will gun laws deter criminals from being willing to get and use guns?
I think this argument borders on absurd and even self-refuting.
If someone is willing to commit burglary, kidnapping, or mass murder (all of which involved breaking a law – certainly with more legal penalty than breaking a gun law), then how would an additional law deter them?
Further, many crimes committed with guns are committed in places where gun laws are in effect. Most of the recent and tragic mass shootings, for example, were in areas where having the firearm was illegal. In that case, the gun law did not deter the person.
Am I missing something? Is there someone out there who can help me understand that aspect of the argument?
2. Will gun laws deter criminals from being able to get and use guns?
I can see one narrow way in which this could be accurate.
If the general number of guns in society goes down and guns become more rare over time in a general way, or at least in the sphere of access of a potential criminal, then it is conceivable that the ease of acquiring a gun could go down in an individual case. In a specific situation I can imagine a case in which an individual would be slowed down… but that could still be the case if guns were legal.
However, I don’t see that this would, in an general way, reduce those with criminal intent being able to get guns. Are there ANY examples of that?
For decades many drugs have been illegal and I don’t think they are any less accessible because of it. We declared war on drugs, but I am not aware of any evidence that they are less available to those intent with getting them. Except in extremely rare and potentially fictional situation, I don’t see how limited legal access to guns will they be meaningfully less accessible to those with criminal intent.
If gun laws are not likely to make those with criminal intent less willing or less able to get them to use in their criminal endeavors, then why limit the freedom of law abiding citizens?
Still more thoughts to follow in regards to this kind of thinking… and maybe to answer some of these questions that aren’t as rhetorical and we often think… next time.
Posted in Random Stuff, Uncategorized, tagged debt, government, taxes on February 1, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
Scenario 2:
I cut the taxes by half to 5%.
Year One:
Harvested 100 units
Taxes 5 units
Family 50 units
Plants 45 units (more left over from less taxes)
He is now able to plant 12.5% more. This is a form of investment.
Year Two:
Harvest 112.5 units
Taxes 5.625 units
Family 50 units
Plants 56.875 units (42% more)
Year Three:
Harvest 142 units (I am going to round now)
Taxes 7.1 units
Family 50 units
Plants 84.9 units (112%)
Year Four:
Harvest 212 units
Taxes 10.6 units
Family 50 units
Plants 151 units …
And so on.
Notice that by reducing the percentage of taxes, in only 4 years I, as the lord, am actually bringing in more money!!
There is are some comments worth making here – first, is the serf’s Family number truly static? I mean it is static as a minimum… but as a maximum?
I asked an actual tax and money expert about this scenario and he pointed out that even if the serf raised his standard of living and started living on 60 units, 70 units… trading 5 units for a new upgraded hammer from the blacksmith, etc… that his new purchases would still create taxable income for the blacksmith, now. So the concept still applies.
What if the serf starts saving the excess in case of a rainy day? The praise God, because that means that if a really bad year happens, he can still plant the next year and I can still get taxes. Him saving may defer my tax income, but it also protects it long term.
Even better for an overall economy, what if he starts hiring workers under him? Each of them start paying taxes as well! Soon, I could be a lord with other lords working under me, sending the taxes rolling in. Few jobs are created by poor people.
This is the basic principle – take money out of the system and it doesn’t grow. If it doesn’t grow, the economy shrinks. If the economy shrinks, tax income shrinks.
Right now, we are producing tax revenues that are a great deal less than out costs. We are Trillions of dollars behind… you can look up the approximation of the discouraging news at www.usdebtlock.org … so we have to actually work our way back to the status quo (see the conversation in comments with Lauren) and sadly, more taxes just reduces our ability to do that over time… so I think our only sane option is to cut spending radically.
Just my thoughts.
Posted in Random Stuff, Uncategorized, tagged economy, taxes on January 28, 2013 | 4 Comments »
The reason increasing taxes doesn’t increase income to the government long term, but reducing taxes does… or at least can.
In advance, I want to express my understanding that I am oversimplifying what has become a very complex issue. Let me also make clear that this principle doesn’t work ad infinitum (you cannot increase tax revenue by reducing tax to 0%, for example). However, this simple example will express the principle:
Imagine that I am a feudal lord and I have a serf.
My serf is able to produce 100 units of wheat every year.
I tax him 10% each year.
10 units a year.
His family eats 50 units.
He sells 40 units of wheat each year in order to buy seeds to plant the acreage needed to produce the 100 units.
This adds up to the 100 units.
Harvests 100 units
Taxes 10 units
Family 50 units
Plants 40 units
This goes on year after year.
I asked my child what I, as the lord, should do in the case that I realize I want to make more income for some reason. My child answered, “Increase the taxes.”
This is precisely what I would think most Americans would say. They could be correct in the short run (sometimes VERY short), but not in the long run.
Scenario 1:
I increase his taxes by another 10% to a total of 20%
His new breakdown Year One is:
I now tax him 20 units.
The family eats 50 units (this is a static number, keep in mind).
He has 30 units to plant…
This is 25% less to plant than last time…
So I assume he produces approximately 25% less wheat… now only 75 units are grown.
Year Two:
Harvests 75 units grown
Taxes 20% 15 units (still more than the 10, but less than the 20)
Family 50 units
Plants 10 units (all that is left, unless he is going to starve his family)
He is now planting 75% less than the year before the tax increase.
Year Three:
Harvests 25 units grown
Taxes 20% 5 units
Family 20 units (less than half what they need)
Plants 0
This is an extreme case for the sake of simplicity and I am certainly aware that things are more complex than this, but there is a basic accuracy here. The principle is that the government initially and immediately takes in more, but in the end acts as a virus that kills the host it was drawing from.
In year 3, now the government draws 0 taxes from the serf.
Solution? Next week.
Posted in Random Stuff, Theological Questions, Uncategorized on October 15, 2012 | 1 Comment »
As Halloween is right around the corner again, I thought I would re-release the two articles about Halloween with some new thoughts inserted in places. Maybe those of you new to this website would enjoy the material here…
This has consistently been one of my most popular articles.
This is much longer and more in depth than many readers might want, but I would rather be thorough here for those who do want it.
A Historical Understanding of Halloween
This is an in-depth look at the history of Halloween, and the timing of the other major Christian Holidays. There will be a follow-up article about what I think the appropriate Christian response to these issues are.
Before recorded history, people have used the length of days to divide out the year, and celebrated the coming and past events. The winter solstice is the shorted day of the year, and the longest night. The summer solstice is the opposite. Also, in between each of them is the equinox, fall and spring, which are the days when the night and day are essentially the same length. Before official calendars and clocks, these were important for measuring years and seasons.
As I recently read, clocks weren’t common in Europe, for example, until after the 1300′s. Before that, the precision of a few bells throughout the day was enough. (Chasing Francis by Ian Cron)
I want to show you how these play into our celebrations today and how I think we should respond. This may be longer than the typical blog, but I think you will appreciate it. If the history and background is just of no interest to you at all, skip down…
The pagan religions tended to focus special or “Holy” days (whence we get the words “holiday”) on obvious changes like these, and how they linked to the events of that time of the year. Remember, before grocery stores and before integrated heating, the three main events for most the those cultures, up through the 1800s were winter (and its hardships), and planting and harvest seasons. Life was pretty much utterly dependent on these.
An example many Christians can relate to here is the Jewish pattern of making use of the moon and its cycles to determine when events and Holidays (Feasts and Sabbaths) were to be held.
Let’s start looking at these in the order they tended to. For the pagans in Briton, for example, the new year started at the end of harvest… they had gathered in the crops that were supposed to keep them alive until next harvest. This would have been a time for preparation (for winter) and celebration (for the harvest). It was already starting to get cold… winter represented death, so part of the celebration would have been to seek to appease/interact with/pacify the evil spirits that killed people in the cold winter.
Winter
In modern times we have a hard time identifying with what winter must have meant. Imagine living in the same depth of cold as we experience today… or worse… but imagine no way to completely weatherproof your home, imagine the diseases and death that came with cramped conditions of a family huddling together, usually with the animals, in the deep cold, with little or no concept of hygiene, and sleeping with the vermin and their parasites, for months.
When the winter solstice approached, the religious leaders would call everyone out. Again, there were two parts to the event. First, recognize who was dead. Who hadn’t made it? The mortality rates were probably staggering. We know that later, even in early colonial times in North America, it wasn’t uncommon for half of the population to die every winter! In Jamestown, for example, 440 of the original 500 settlers died in the first three years (Kelso and Hancock). What then? Well, you redistributed the goods. People who had more than they needed gave it to those who were running low. There was likely a new series of weddings – new widows and widowers married to one another and moving their families together into the best holding and combining their resources. You would have acknowledged death, but celebrated life in the midst of it. “Well, I made it this far through the winter” was something worth celebrating. So, you got your biggest best log for the fire to prepare for the longest night of the year, you gathered around the evergreen tree as the symbol for life that perseveres in the midst of death, you hang the Holly branch as another example of it… what else are you going to hang in the homes of all the newly weds to encourage fertility? There aren’t any flowers or garlands. You share the excess, you bid each other goodnight, and then you hunker back to try and survive the second half of winter death.
Maybe, after a few months, you check to see if the animals, especially the burrowing sleepers, have started to emerge, or if they hide back as if they were afraid of their shadows. That’s right, Woodchuck Chuckers…
Spring
Then, spring begins to arrive. What do you naturally celebrate then? New life. For humans, the long winter is almost over and many of them, in addition to surviving winter themselves… while bored and trying to stay warm, got pregnant many months ago, and are now very pregnant – celebration! The stores of food are thinning, but berries, fish, deer, birds, etc. are back. Domesticated animals begin to experience the abundance of green and being to have offspring, some in amazing numbers! So, what would be your symbols of the Spring Equinox? Symbols of fertility… Rabbits (what do things reproduce like? Rabbits!), eggs, bright colors, flowers, lambs… new life. Gods and goddesses of fertility and rain are the focus of attention.
Soon, though, it is a busy time – planting season – sowing. Harrowing, plowing, tilling, planting, watering, fertilizing, tending, keeping out animals, chasing off dangers, pulling diseased plants… this is a busy time, not to mention calving seasons, new born lambs, piglets, rabbits, etc. There are some celebrations, but mostly people are too busy to play much.
Summer
The busiest seasons of all – the reason we still have summer break really probably hearkens back to the days when the children were needed at home for harvest. During the summer, different plants – vegetables, grains, fruits, ripen and must be taken off of the vine or they rot and are lost for the whole year. There is little room for error – seeds must be taken and preserved for next year, and everything is harvested. Celebrations here are minimal… the rest of the year is dependent on how things go in just a few short weeks!
Fall
Harvest season is wrapping up, people are slaughtering or hunting meat, and salting, smoking or drying it. When all of this is done, in time to prepare for winter, as the Fall Equinox approaches, it is time to party. The people need to gather together, and trade out stores for the winter. People whose crops failed need people to give them enough to survive the winter. They might go house to house and ask for what they need. Celebrations are held to celebrate the bountiful harvest… baskets are filled with the fresh good things of harvest – vegetables, dried fruits, gourds, meats – in such an abundance and variety that today we would call it a “cornucopia”. However, we mustn’t forget the dark side of this holiday. Just as mid-winter accepts death and looks forward to the hope of life, fall accepts life but looks forward to the imminence of death. The mysterious sources of sudden illness and death, “spirits”, must be dealt with. They are prepared to run free throughout winter, they are coming out of their realms to prepare to assault the people. So, we hang out gourds, carved to scare away even evil spirits, we light huge bonfires (made up of the dried sheaves of threshed wheat, probably) to scare them away, etc. Children, taking advantage of the scary mindsets, dress themselves in scary costumes, and the adults (who of course, are just indulging their children) pretend to be scared of these little evil spirits, and bribe the evil spirits with little treats to stay away from their homes this winter. The air of fear of death, while celebrating harvest, must have been an odd mixture. Pacify the evil spirits, and also try to scare them away.
In the British Isles, this was called the season of “Samhuinn”. This was literally just their name for the month we call November. The last day of the month before November was called “Oidhche Shamhna” – roughly, “November Night.” And apparently this was treated as the beginning of the year for the early Britons. The celebrations connected to this time were linked to the pagan groups, like the Druids. (Beltane, wikipedia’s citation)
So, how does this play out in regards to Christians holidays?
When the early Christian, mostly the medieval Roman Catholic Church, came to the far Western World (there were allegedly already some Christian influences there, possibly lending credence to the legend that the Apostle Thomas may have visited the British Isles before the turn of the first century), they began to interact with the local peasants and seek to convince them to convert from their pagan ways (Coffman).
There are only a few major events in the Christian calendar, and we are only really aware of the dates on one of those – Easter. Thanks to the Jews, and their faithful adherence to the lunar calendar and the clarity of the New Testament connection to the death and resurrection of Jesus to the Passover, we know pretty nearly when Jesus died and rose…
And the supposition I am about to present still fits really well with this one too…
Otherwise, the Christian leadership apparently decided to compete with the pagan festivals by setting their (our) holidays (remember, “Holy Days”). For example, we really have virtually no idea what time of the year Jesus was born in… though there are some pretty good arguments based on the time when Zacharias’ family was in the temple, and the times of the year that shepherds stayed out all night with their flocks, etc., we really don’t know (Sheifler). However, it was almost certainly NOT late December.
It seems likely that the Christians decided to essentially, throw a bigger and better party on or near the pagan ones! Ok, remember what was being celebrated by the pagans at the Winter Solstice? The hopes for life to come – salvation from the death of winter that is near… so, what a perfect place to (otherwise arbitrarily) celebrate the birth of New Life! So, my assumption is that the mostly illiterate farm families just began to integrate both celebrations! After all, if your typical life is scraped together with death always around the corner, wouldn’t it make sense to go to both parties?
It is easy to see, then why, to this day, we celebrate Christmas with evergreen trees, holly bushes, yule logs (the big log meant to last out the entirety of the longest night of the year, remember)… as well as giving gifts (spreading the wealth). Of course, many of these fit nicely in with the Nativity story as well – the birth of the Savior, the gifts of the Magi, the later charitable works of Nicolas (Saint Nicolas… or Santa ‘Colas… Santa Claus). Instead, we celebrate the Christ’s Mass (the name for the main Catholic worship services)… “Christmas”.
With Easter (though for years, it was taught that the name came from the name of a fertility goddess, but that seems to be under debate…it might be connected, but some seem to say it that before the goddess, it came from the word for “East” – and that literally meant “rising”… or even that the goddess connection was error (since that is where the sun comes up)) is also easy to see the integration, and what a natural integration it is! (unknown article *, Harper) If the spring equinox was about new life, a new degree of abundance, then what better connection that the True New Life – Resurrection, and the purchase and the eternal defeat of sin and death, the victory of the Lamb of God! Today, we still celebrate His work, we have fun with colorful eggs, bunnies, lambs, and lilies.
Summer, if you recall, is too busy for anyone to do much celebration… so, for the sake of what is already a long article, we move along…
So, what about the end of Harvest? The people were “celebrating” Death and the preparation for death and winter. So, the Church came along and decided to celebrate what else? Martyrs. The Church had this celebration already, called “All Saints Day” sometimes celebrated by some at different time of the year, but in the mid-700’s, it was moved by Pope Gregory III to Nov 1st officially (Brittanica and Christianity History Timeline). Again, it was a great fit. Recognize in faith those who died in the name of Christ when the pagans are preaching fear of the spirits of the dead. The “eve” before All Saints Day was Holy (or “Hallowed”) Day Eve… which over time was shortened to “Hallowed ‘Eve”… Hallowe’en”. Still, they were mixed… the pagan “Fall Festival” or “Harvest Festival” mixed with the Christian “Halloween”. (How ironic that most churches have fled from the word “Halloween” and moved to “Fall Festival”)… we party, we have bonfires, pumpkins, and costumes.
So, with all of these main celebrations being celebrated in a way that integrates all kinds of natural links, agriculturally obvious connections, pagan aspects of worship, and Christian teaching, what is the right response of the modern believer?
For my thoughts on that question, please check out the other, much shorter article about that!
Citations
American Catholic.Org http://www.americancatholic.org/features/default.aspx?id=23
Beltane. http://www.beltane.org/festivals/samhuinn
Choi, Hanel. National Institute of American History and Democracy, http://niahd.wm.edu/index.php?browse=entry&id=172
Coffman, Elesha. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/news/2000/dec08.html
Cohn, Emily. National Institute of American History and Democracy, http://niahd.wm.edu/index.php?browse=entry&id=146
Harper, Douglas. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Easter
History Channel. http://www.history.com/topics/halloween
Kelso, Dr. William and Hancock, Dr. Franklin. PBS http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/previous_seasons/case_jamestown/about.html
* Unknown currently… This article does a good job of gathering and articulating the arguments I found in other places… I am trying to find out who the author is and what his credentials are or his sources… http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/190170
Myra, Harold. “Is Halloween a Witches Brew?” http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2000/octoberweb-only/42.0.html
Sheifler, Michael. http://biblelight.net/sukkoth.htm. Again, I do not know
All Saints Day material. http://www.britannica.com/facts/5/22039/Saint-Gregory-III-as-discussed-in-All-Saints%E2%80%99-Day-Christianity
http://www.christianhistorytimeline.com/DAILYF/2003/11/daily-11-01-2003.shtml
As well as information from the www.Wikipedia.org information for Samhain and All Saints Day.
Note: Anytime I use information I find on Wiki, I try to use phrases like “apparently” or “some think” in an effort to designate that information gathered here may or may not come from trustworthy information. However, I think that much of what we find here is pretty well policed and at least created a good start for further research. However,Wikipedia cites
Chadwick, Nora The Celts London, Penguin. p. 181: “Samhain (1 November) was the beginning of the Celtic year, at which time any barriers between man and the supernatural were lowered”.
Posted in Personal, Random Stuff, Uncategorized on November 28, 2011 | 6 Comments »
My regular computer is in the E.R. with a dying Hard Drive, so I will have to take a short break in the articles I have been writing. The timing was perfect, though, because I went to a movie today that I wanted to comment on:
The Muppets
Ok, periodically, I am going to try to start doing a little movie review action… not primarily about the “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” of a movie, but to comments on its value for the family…
First… I want to comment on the recent rash of remakes and comebacks of former movies and movie concepts.
I know that it often seems like Independent movies and Pixar (and some DreamWorks) are the only people even attempting to come up with new-ish stories… and I think that is a valid critique of the movie industry…
But I want to tip my hat to something I have seen in the last few years…
And that is tipped hats to the movie that is being remade, brought back, or sequel-ed after years of silence….
If you are singing a Billy Joel song, you sing it the same way he did/does. You refer back to the original… that is just right, in my opinion.
It used to be that when someone remade a movie, they were obsessed with making it “uniquely theirs”… different, fresh, taking it in a totally different direction. The “new” one seems to have been made by people who neither knew nor liked the originals… or remake their own originals…
(sometimes even it was their creation originally! I mean, really, did Lucas ever even watch Episodes 4,5,6?… Greedo shoots first? In what universe?)
Yuck.
I have the same opinion about movies that tell the story told in a book, but I could really get off topic there. Really – Faramir takes the ring to Osgiliath?
However, the new model is to “tip the hat” to the original…
The first and third Mission Impossible movies
Karate Kid withJackieChan
Star Trek
A-Team
Rambo
Rocky Balboa
Predators
And there are many more movies that tip the hat in respect.
Some of these movies aren’t really all that good, and I certainly would not recommend many of them, but I appreciate that they seemed to have been made by FANS of the originals.
Never let someone make coffee in your church unless they love coffee.
‘Nuff said.
Second… to let you know, that I am a fan from childhood of the Muppets. I always enjoyed watching the television show as a child. I am sure that Henson had plenty of beliefs and political views that I would not agree with (fully an assumption, I have not checked)…
But the morals and teachings were always really encouraging to me – even as a kid! As someone who had a best friend, I totally related to the Fozzie Bear/Kermit friendship.
As a young man who, until High School, never felt like I could relate well to the girls I really liked the most, I was able to relate to Kermit’s uncertainty about Piggy – is she the one for him or not?
Seeing individually odd and still radically different people struggle through but make it work probably played a role in my belief that friendship is the ultimate human relationship…
(to pre-empt the question: the marriage relationship should even be a relationship in which the powerful intimacy of a life-long devotion of friendship is expressed sexually too… within its role as a living parable of God’s love for His people.)
The Old Men, Beaker, and Animal should be turned into archetypes for something.
Third… I like any movie that doesn’t take itself too seriously. I think that is why I continue to keep “The Princess Bride” on my top movies list…
There is little more maturely funny than a genre that can poke fun at itself a little bit… especially when it is as well known and iconic as The Muppets are.
Fourth… I also like it when a work of art can have a little fun at its own expense, but even moreso when it is willing to make commentary on its genre… in this case – visual media.
Fifth… Can I add that I think it must require 100x times more intelligence, cleverness and ingenuity to be funny and stay clean. I think that is why a thousand crass comedians are forgotten every day… but why Bill Cosby (and hopefully) Brian Regan, among many others, will be remembered.
* Ok, so, my childhood connections to the Muppets… I have strong feelings when I hear the Muppet Show intro. The tradition of it actually (ok, you will laugh at me) reminds me of how I feel when I hear the traditional wedding vows.
* This movie has constant references to the originals… I am confident that the makers not only like, but love The Muppets.
* Many of the comedy riffs are connected to the original movies and television shows. “Traveling by map” is apparently much faster than just driving or flying, for example. Constant, un-warned appearances of celebrities is another example… I could go on, but I don’t want to ruin anything for anyone.
* The commentary on society in general and visual media in specific is pretty potent… if not very subtle. The show that the Muppets replace is called “Punch the Teacher.” Again, not subtle.
The play against big business is a common theme for the Muppets (remember the Chicken mogul?) and maybe even that is a little tongue-in-cheek poke at their own preachiness at times (the badguy’s name is Tex Richman – an oil tycoon)… did I mention not subtle?
Maybe I am reading my own perspective onto it, but this almost seemed like a poke atHollywood’s tendencies to create a clear 2-dimensional arch-villain out of the business world. Or maybe they really thinkTexasoil men are the real evil left in the world.
Finally, the way that all of us “normal” people seem to treat celebrities is handled in some pretty funny ways.
For those who were at our “Gospel According to Pixar” event: was there a parable?
(if you missed it, you can find it here: http://b3ministries.blogspot.com/2011/11/thanksgiving-for-future-with-forgiven.html)
Sure – the question of identity is dealt with in another non-subtle song… Are we men or Muppets? Where do we belong? For former students of my identity curriculum – who am I one of?
Are we uniquely designed to belong somewhere?
How about the question of making sure we don’t forget those who matter most to us? I think there are a lot of husbands, wives, fathers (and mothers) who need to be reminded of that message.
Interesting message that I have certainly found to be true as a therapist: it is easier to believe in other than in yourself.
More conversation about the Gospel According to Jim Henson at http://www.mbird.com/2011/11/bears-wear-hats-the-gracious-absurdism-of-jim-henson-and-the-muppets/.
* Ok, and this movie is clean. Even the one small dance scene with Vegas-style dancers is cut so short (and their outfits aren’t cut as short as you expect either) that there is no time for anything very shady. The comedy is clean… the language is clean… in fact, that is one of the very points being made by the movie –
Whatever happened to media that can be enjoyed by children without seeking to work hard to destroy innocence? It went wherever the Muppets went.
Well, I am glad they are back…
Apparently I am not the only one: with an estimated $29.5 million Friday-Sunday and $42 Million if you start measuring on Wednesday, The Muppet’s $10 million goal (see the movie to understand) has been blown away… and it isn’t even 3D… and only cost $45 million to make (http://www.boxofficeguru.com/weekend.htm).
I assume that the sales of the old movies and television shows will explode too. I am shopping for them as I write this.
Now, do you think someone might listen and bring Kermit, Beaker, Animal and the gang back to Prime Time?
Posted in Random Stuff, Theological Questions, Uncategorized on October 4, 2011 | 3 Comments »
As Halloween is right around the corner again, I thought I would re-release the two articles about Halloween with some new thoughts inserted in places. Maybe those of you new to this website would enjoy the material here…
This is much longer and more in depth than many readers might want, but I would rather be thorough here for those who do want it.
A Historical Understanding of Halloween
This is an in-depth look at the history of Halloween, and the timing of the other major Christian Holidays. There will be a follow-up article about what I think the appropriate Christian response to these issues are.
Before recorded history, people have used the length of days to divide out the year, and celebrated the coming and past events. The winter solstice is the shorted day of the year, and the longest night. The summer solstice is the opposite. Also, in between each of them is the equinox, fall and spring, which are the days when the night and day are essentially the same length. Before official calendars and clocks, these were important for measuring years and seasons.
As I recently read, clocks weren’t common in Europe, for example, until after the 1300′s. Before that, the precision of a few bells throughout the day was enough. (Chasing Francis by Ian Cron)
I want to show you how these play into our celebrations today and how I think we should respond. This may be longer than the typical blog, but I think you will appreciate it. If the history and background is just of no interest to you at all, skip down…
The pagan religions tended to focus special or “Holy” days (whence we get the words “holiday”) on obvious changes like these, and how they linked to the events of that time of the year. Remember, before grocery stores and before integrated heating, the three main events for most the those cultures, up through the 1800s were winter (and its hardships), and planting and harvest seasons. Life was pretty much utterly dependent on these.
An example many Christians can relate to here is the Jewish pattern of making use of the moon and its cycles to determine when events and Holidays (Feasts and Sabbaths) were to be held.
Let’s start looking at these in the order they tended to. For the pagans in Briton, for example, the new year started at the end of harvest… they had gathered in the crops that were supposed to keep them alive until next harvest. This would have been a time for preparation (for winter) and celebration (for the harvest). It was already starting to get cold… winter represented death, so part of the celebration would have been to seek to appease/interact with/pacify the evil spirits that killed people in the cold winter.
Winter
In modern times we have a hard time identifying with what winter must have meant. Imagine living in the same depth of cold as we experience today… or worse… but imagine no way to completely weatherproof your home, imagine the diseases and death that came with cramped conditions of a family huddling together, usually with the animals, in the deep cold, with little or no concept of hygiene, and sleeping with the vermin and their parasites, for months.
When the winter solstice approached, the religious leaders would call everyone out. Again, there were two parts to the event. First, recognize who was dead. Who hadn’t made it? The mortality rates were probably staggering. We know that later, even in early colonial times in North America, it wasn’t uncommon for half of the population to die every winter! In Jamestown, for example, 440 of the original 500 settlers died in the first three years (Kelso and Hancock). What then? Well, you redistributed the goods. People who had more than they needed gave it to those who were running low. There was likely a new series of weddings – new widows and widowers married to one another and moving their families together into the best holding and combining their resources. You would have acknowledged death, but celebrated life in the midst of it. “Well, I made it this far through the winter” was something worth celebrating. So, you got your biggest best log for the fire to prepare for the longest night of the year, you gathered around the evergreen tree as the symbol for life that perseveres in the midst of death, you hang the Holly branch as another example of it… what else are you going to hang in the homes of all the newly weds to encourage fertility? There aren’t any flowers or garlands. You share the excess, you bid each other goodnight, and then you hunker back to try and survive the second half of winter death.
Maybe, after a few months, you check to see if the animals, especially the burrowing sleepers, have started to emerge, or if they hide back as if they were afraid of their shadows. That’s right, Woodchuck Chuckers…
Spring
Then, spring begins to arrive. What do you naturally celebrate then? New life. For humans, the long winter is almost over and many of them, in addition to surviving winter themselves… while bored and trying to stay warm, got pregnant many months ago, and are now very pregnant – celebration! The stores of food are thinning, but berries, fish, deer, birds, etc. are back. Domesticated animals begin to experience the abundance of green and being to have offspring, some in amazing numbers! So, what would be your symbols of the Spring Equinox? Symbols of fertility… Rabbits (what do things reproduce like? Rabbits!), eggs, bright colors, flowers, lambs… new life. Gods and goddesses of fertility and rain are the focus of attention.
Soon, though, it is a busy time – planting season – sowing. Harrowing, plowing, tilling, planting, watering, fertilizing, tending, keeping out animals, chasing off dangers, pulling diseased plants… this is a busy time, not to mention calving seasons, new born lambs, piglets, rabbits, etc. There are some celebrations, but mostly people are too busy to play much.
Summer
The busiest seasons of all – the reason we still have summer break really probably hearkens back to the days when the children were needed at home for harvest. During the summer, different plants – vegetables, grains, fruits, ripen and must be taken off of the vine or they rot and are lost for the whole year. There is little room for error – seeds must be taken and preserved for next year, and everything is harvested. Celebrations here are minimal… the rest of the year is dependent on how things go in just a few short weeks!
Fall
Harvest season is wrapping up, people are slaughtering or hunting meat, and salting, smoking or drying it. When all of this is done, in time to prepare for winter, as the Fall Equinox approaches, it is time to party. The people need to gather together, and trade out stores for the winter. People whose crops failed need people to give them enough to survive the winter. They might go house to house and ask for what they need. Celebrations are held to celebrate the bountiful harvest… baskets are filled with the fresh good things of harvest – vegetables, dried fruits, gourds, meats – in such an abundance and variety that today we would call it a “cornucopia”. However, we mustn’t forget the dark side of this holiday. Just as mid-winter accepts death and looks forward to the hope of life, fall accepts life but looks forward to the imminence of death. The mysterious sources of sudden illness and death, “spirits”, must be dealt with. They are prepared to run free throughout winter, they are coming out of their realms to prepare to assault the people. So, we hang out gourds, carved to scare away even evil spirits, we light huge bonfires (made up of the dried sheaves of threshed wheat, probably) to scare them away, etc. Children, taking advantage of the scary mindsets, dress themselves in scary costumes, and the adults (who of course, are just indulging their children) pretend to be scared of these little evil spirits, and bribe the evil spirits with little treats to stay away from their homes this winter. The air of fear of death, while celebrating harvest, must have been an odd mixture. Pacify the evil spirits, and also try to scare them away.
In the British Isles, this was called the season of “Samhuinn”. This was literally just their name for the month we call November. The last day of the month before November was called “Oidhche Shamhna” – roughly, “November Night.” And apparently this was treated as the beginning of the year for the early Britons. The celebrations connected to this time were linked to the pagan groups, like the Druids. (Beltane, wikipedia’s citation)
So, how does this play out in regards to Christians holidays?
When the early Christian, mostly the medieval Roman Catholic Church, came to the far Western World (there were allegedly already some Christian influences there, possibly lending credence to the legend that the Apostle Thomas may have visited the British Isles before the turn of the first century), they began to interact with the local peasants and seek to convince them to convert from their pagan ways (Coffman).
There are only a few major events in the Christian calendar, and we are only really aware of the dates on one of those – Easter. Thanks to the Jews, and their faithful adherence to the lunar calendar and the clarity of the New Testament connection to the death and resurrection of Jesus to the Passover, we know pretty nearly when Jesus died and rose…
And the supposition I am about to present still fits really well with this one too…
Otherwise, the Christian leadership apparently decided to compete with the pagan festivals by setting their (our) holidays (remember, “Holy Days”). For example, we really have virtually no idea what time of the year Jesus was born in… though there are some pretty good arguments based on the time when Zacharias’ family was in the temple, and the times of the year that shepherds stayed out all night with their flocks, etc., we really don’t know (Sheifler). However, it was almost certainly NOT late December.
It seems likely that the Christians decided to essentially, throw a bigger and better party on or near the pagan ones! Ok, remember what was being celebrated by the pagans at the Winter Solstice? The hopes for life to come – salvation from the death of winter that is near… so, what a perfect place to (otherwise arbitrarily) celebrate the birth of New Life! So, my assumption is that the mostly illiterate farm families just began to integrate both celebrations! After all, if your typical life is scraped together with death always around the corner, wouldn’t it make sense to go to both parties?
It is easy to see, then why, to this day, we celebrate Christmas with evergreen trees, holly bushes, yule logs (the big log meant to last out the entirety of the longest night of the year, remember)… as well as giving gifts (spreading the wealth). Of course, many of these fit nicely in with the Nativity story as well – the birth of the Savior, the gifts of the Magi, the later charitable works of Nicolas (Saint Nicolas… or Santa ‘Colas… Santa Claus). Instead, we celebrate the Christ’s Mass (the name for the main Catholic worship services)… “Christmas”.
With Easter (though for years, it was taught that the name came from the name of a fertility goddess, but that seems to be under debate…it might be connected, but some seem to say it that before the goddess, it came from the word for “East” – and that literally meant “rising”… or even that the goddess connection was error (since that is where the sun comes up)) is also easy to see the integration, and what a natural integration it is! (unknown article *, Harper) If the spring equinox was about new life, a new degree of abundance, then what better connection that the True New Life – Resurrection, and the purchase and the eternal defeat of sin and death, the victory of the Lamb of God! Today, we still celebrate His work, we have fun with colorful eggs, bunnies, lambs, and lilies.
Summer, if you recall, is too busy for anyone to do much celebration… so, for the sake of what is already a long article, we move along…
So, what about the end of Harvest? The people were “celebrating” Death and the preparation for death and winter. So, the Church came along and decided to celebrate what else? Martyrs. The Church had this celebration already, called “All Saints Day” sometimes celebrated by some at different time of the year, but in the mid-700’s, it was moved by Pope Gregory III to Nov 1st officially (Brittanica and Christianity History Timeline). Again, it was a great fit. Recognize in faith those who died in the name of Christ when the pagans are preaching fear of the spirits of the dead. The “eve” before All Saints Day was Holy (or “Hallowed”) Day Eve… which over time was shortened to “Hallowed ‘Eve”… Hallowe’en”. Still, they were mixed… the pagan “Fall Festival” or “Harvest Festival” mixed with the Christian “Halloween”. (How ironic that most churches have fled from the word “Halloween” and moved to “Fall Festival”)… we party, we have bonfires, pumpkins, and costumes.
So, with all of these main celebrations being celebrated in a way that integrates all kinds of natural links, agriculturally obvious connections, pagan aspects of worship, and Christian teaching, what is the right response of the modern believer?
For my thoughts on that question, please check out the other, much shorter article about that!
Citations
American Catholic.Org http://www.americancatholic.org/features/default.aspx?id=23
Beltane. http://www.beltane.org/festivals/samhuinn
Choi, Hanel. National Institute of American History and Democracy, http://niahd.wm.edu/index.php?browse=entry&id=172
Coffman, Elesha. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/news/2000/dec08.html
Cohn, Emily. National Institute of American History and Democracy, http://niahd.wm.edu/index.php?browse=entry&id=146
Harper, Douglas. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Easter
History Channel. http://www.history.com/topics/halloween
Kelso, Dr. William and Hancock, Dr. Franklin. PBS http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/previous_seasons/case_jamestown/about.html
* Unknown currently… This article does a good job of gathering and articulating the arguments I found in other places… I am trying to find out who the author is and what his credentials are or his sources… http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/190170
Myra, Harold. “Is Halloween a Witches Brew?” http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2000/octoberweb-only/42.0.html
Sheifler, Michael. http://biblelight.net/sukkoth.htm. Again, I do not know
All Saints Day material. http://www.britannica.com/facts/5/22039/Saint-Gregory-III-as-discussed-in-All-Saints%E2%80%99-Day-Christianity
http://www.christianhistorytimeline.com/DAILYF/2003/11/daily-11-01-2003.shtml
As well as information from the www.Wikipedia.org information for Samhain and All Saints Day.
Note: Anytime I use information I find on Wiki, I try to use phrases like “apparently” or “some think” in an effort to designate that information gathered here may or may not come from trustworthy information. However, I think that much of what we find here is pretty well policed and at least created a good start for further research. However,Wikipedia cites
Chadwick, Nora The Celts London, Penguin. p. 181: “Samhain (1 November) was the beginning of the Celtic year, at which time any barriers between man and the supernatural were lowered”.
Posted in Men / Phalanx, Personal, Therapy, Uncategorized on October 3, 2011 | 1 Comment »
After the articles on the Powers and Dangers of expectations (http://chrismlegg.com/2011/09/12/the-dangers-of-expectations-part-i/),
I was asked by a good friend to follow it up with a conversation on the topic of: Disappointment.
And I hate to let him down…
Budda bum bum bum.
This one is for you, Chad.
I realized that it was a good idea since I seemed to indicate that disappointment was the emotional result of not getting what we want, hope, or desire.
I was contrasting this to the emotional response of not getting what we “expect” (betrayal, frustration, etc.)…
Or the emotional response to not receiving an “entitlement” (anger, rage, justification).
But, then, am I saying that even when we have the appropriate desire for something – a hope for a certain gift, that we could still end up experiencing disappointment?
Uh, yes.
And I think it is important to recognize this. We respond with such horror to the idea of either
It will be shocking to future generations how deeply in denial we are, and how we rarely seem to take an honest look at our existence.
Of course we experience disappointment! Of course anyone who would relate to us will experience disappointment with us.
The emotion of disappointment is the constant companion of all of us… welcome to the human condition – possibly as God intended! (but more on this later).
I think only in our vain, egocentric, or pampered lives do we respond this way to the idea of disappointment. One evidence of this is the way that
virtually no one even uses the word “disappointment” anymore.
When we want something and don’t get it, we are “devastated” (often “utterly”).
When we desire and our desire goes unmet, we are “crushed” (often “absolutely”).
First, maybe it would be easier for us if we could go back to just being disappointed. I got all of these amazing gifts that are free and fun, but I didn’t get something that I wanted. Bummer. A little disappointment. Life goes on and it is still great.
Now, of course, there are things that can happen in our lives that are crushing, or devastating.
In fact, recognition of this is part of why I wanted to publish the articles on grief first. http://chrismlegg.com/2011/08/01/grief-and-grieving/
I would never want experiencing a loss of any kind, especially a loss of gravity and importance, to be belittled or minimized. Wanting, expecting, or desiring are not the only options. There is pain and grief and need and more.
And, of course, consistent or constant small disappointments can be as crippling over time as one big one.
The writer of Proverbs rightly reminds us that “deferred hope leads to a broken heart” (13:12).
So, while not minimizing what people experience, I just want to remind us that disappointment is a normal and healthy part of life…
And it has to be ok in any meaningful relationship for disappointment to exist! If I am not allowed to be disappointed, then I am also not allowed to hope, or desire, or even want. Let us allow each other to want and desire, and when we cannot fulfill what they want, it is ok to encourage them in their disappointment…
Even when we are the cause of it!
God forbid we steal other people’s opportunity to want and wish for things, but being too frail or too prideful to let them be disappointed
in us.
Finally, please not how this creates two ongoing effects (at least):
1. We get to give and receive grace all the time. If I can accept that there are things about me or my behavior that, of course, are going to disappoint my wife, kids, friends, students, others, then I can live basking in the grace that lets them love me anyway!
Ok, so I know someone is thinking that would be an excuse to be lazy, but that is quite obviously not accurate – Victor Hugo once said ““The
greatest happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved — loved for ourselves, or rather, loved in spite of ourselves.”
2. We don’t get too attached here, because we never quite attain a life without some kind of disappointment. Even if life is really good in 90% of ways for a few moments, we experience disappointment, even if just small amounts, all the time.
This, I think will be one of the major differences between Earth and Heaven. There, we shall be home, where we are meant to be, and likely experience not even the least disappointment.
Disappointment is a great way of making sure we never mistake this life, in all of its wonder and grandeur and abundance, as home.
Posted in Men / Phalanx, Uncategorized on December 16, 2010 | 2 Comments »
Today I re-organized the Phalanx articles so that they went in a certain order… I hope they are helpful. So, when you check them out, or when you send someone to read them, encourage them to read them in order. Each article ends with the link for the next one. Let me know if you have any feedback as to the order I put them in. Thanks
Chris