Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Welcome.

I believe in the power of truth.  I also believe in the power of freedom.  I am neverendingly impressed at how truth sets us free, and how freedom opens us up to the truth.  Though I have some posts that are personal to me, this is my ministry site.  I post articles about all kinds of things that are of interest to me… and I also find great joy in answering, or at trying to answer, or at least discussing, questions.  Feel free to ask them here.

I am still working on these sites, but the best way to navigate this material is either the tabs at the top of the page – these take you to totally different pages with targeted information.  If you are researching me as a personal therapist, click the Counseling/Therapy tab… if you are a man looking for encouragement, ideas and support in life, click on Phalanx… if you are considering me as a speaker, teacher, pastor, or consultant, that information should be available there.

Most of my work hours are spent serving at FBC’s South Campus in Tyler. Check out the amazing ministry there.

I am also the lead therapist at the Alethia Counseling Center in Tyler, Texas… and I love the team of Counselors we have here, so…

I want to introduce you to our team of counselors at the offices:

Millie Tanner, LPC.  Millie is an LPC, and has been doing work here for about a while already and was with Women of Grace before that.  She is truly realistic, strong and compassionate.  Her experience shows as she does an excellent job and inspires great confidence in her clients.   She is especially gifted at marriage counseling, in my humble (but accurate) opinion. (http://www.tannertherapy.com/)

Zach Herrin, LPC.   Zach is a great counselor and is especially good with engaging with people through the lense of being someone loved deeply by God.  He has a special gift at developing rapport with young men and their families.  I think his masculine and biblically strong style of counseling will connect well with men.  (www.herrincounseling.com)

Keely Burks, LPCI.  Keely is an LPC intern, which means that she has finished her Master’s Degree, and now has to complete 3000 hours of what is essentially a residency under a an LPC supervisor.  She did some of her practicum work here and did a fantastic job, and offers play therapy too! (http://www.keelyburkscounseling.com/)

Amy Waters, LPCI.  Amy is also working on her intern hours… This means she has completed her Masters and has joined us full time!   She is gifted and has close to a decade of experience helping students and families after her years as a Pine Cove Family Camp Conference Director.  She has an amazing talent for seeing as God sees and helping people do the same.  You need to schedule time with her… it is a healthy decision for anyone. ( www.amywaterscounseling.com)

Nancy Mayer, LPC.  Nancy is our newest addition.  Nancy is just opening up multiple hours at our office.  She has many years of experience as a chaplain and as a counselor!  She works with couples, individuals and is especially gifted at working with people struggling with traumatic experiences they have faced or are facing.

If you are interested in scheduling with any of us, call us at 903 561 8955

…If you are more interested in browsing my articles, then your best bet might be the catagories list to the right.  If you are interested in me writing an article on a given topic, you can request it in any comments section… I will try to get to it as soon as I can!

I will continue to post all new articles here as well as on the targeted site, so either option should still give you the chance to find what you are looking for.

Typically, my series, sermons and seminars will be found at:  Talks

Thanks for stopping in… God Bless you and Keep you.

Chris

If you haven’t taken the pop quiz, I recommend going here and taking it first.  It’s more fun that way!

Or, go ahead and peek, you lightweight… ;-)

Answers:

1.  “God helps those who helps themselves” (nope, other.  This was Sydney Algernon)

2.  “Spare the rod, spoil the child” (Sort of.  Maybe not precisely these words, but Proverbs 13:24 indicates the potential importance of corporal punishment)

3.  “Cleanliness is next to Godliness”  (Other… possibly John Wesley, but not in the Bible)

4.  “God works in mysterious ways” (not precisely, though the concept of God’s ways being tough for us to comprehend is common, like in Job 37:5)

5.  “Pride goes before a fall” (very close… Proverbs 16:18)

6.  “a fool and his money are soon parted” (Other… Thomas Tusser in 1573)

7.  “To thine own self be true”  (nope, but it is in Hamlet Act 1 Sc 3)

8.  “…beggars can’t be choosers.” (Not the Bible… John Heywood)

9.  “Money is root of all evil” (Not this one, either… but the LOVE of money is apparently the root of all kinds of evil, 1 Tim 6:10)

10.  “A house divided against itself cannot stand” (Bible, Surprise – like most great American leaders, Abraham Lincoln was quoting scripture when he used this phrase about the United States… Jesus said it, Mark 3:25)

11.  “…all things in moderation… “(not in the Bible… moderation was a Greek virtue and talked about regularly)

12.  “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” (Bible!  The golden rule is from Jesus… Matt 7:12)

13.  “The eye is the window to the soul.” (nope, opposite… Matt 6:22 says the eye is the lamp of the body)

14.  “The lion will lie down with the lamb.” (Not there… Amazingly, this pairing does NOT occur in the Bible.  It is close… Is 11:6, Is 65:25)

15.  “Repent and sin no more…” (not in the Bible just like this… close is John 8:11, “Go, and from now on, sin no more”.)

16.  The Seven deadly sins listed as wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony.  (This list does not appear in the Bible.  There are 7 things listed, though, in Proverbs 6:16-19)

17.  “Charity begins at home.” (This is another one NOT in the Bible – but instead from Thomas Browne)

18.  “Honesty is the best policy.” (Maybe true, but not in the Bible… Ben Franklin is given credit for this)

19.  “Love the sinner, hate the sin.”   (Not in the Bible in those words, though the concept is visible… but that phrase really probably comes from St. Augustine from the letter in 211)

20.  “Neither a borrower nor a lender be” (Shakespeare, not Solomon… Hamlet Act I Sc 3)

21.  “The borrower is the servant of the lender.” (Now, this one is from the Bible, Prov 22:7)

22.  “Don’t judge a book by its cover.” (not in the Bible, but the concept can be found at John 7:24)

23.  “Don’t let the right hand know what the left hand is doing.” (Yes!  About giving, not poor communication, though….  Matt 6:3)

24.  “Forgive and forget.” (not in these words, but we are instructed consistently to forgive others, eg. Matt 6:14, Eph 4:32… However, God apparently intentionally doesn’t remember our sins (not the same as a passive forgetting – active not remembering, Hebrews 8:12)

25.  “Practice what you preach.” (not these words, but the concept can be found in Matt 23:3)

26.  “…better to reign in hell than serve in Heaven.” (Paradise Lost – again, not biblical.  Satan does not “reign in hell” – hell is created for his punishment, 2 Peter 2:4, Rev 20:10)

27.  God is the “great physician” (not in the Bible… in Col 4:14, Luke is called “the beloved physician”… but God regularly heals the sick throughout scripture)

28.  “All men are created equal” (Not in the Bible… in the Declaration of Independence)

29.  “A penny saved is a penny earned.” (nope… typically assigned to Ben Franklin)

30.  “Idle hands are the devils workshop.” (Not sure the source, maybe Isaac Watts, but not the Bible)

31.  “God’s will is the safest place to be…” (not in the Bible and worse, not biblical – not if safety is an earthly concept.  Being in the center of God’s will didn’t work out “safely” for Jesus (Luke 9:22) or Paul (2 Tim 1:12)…  or the early church (Rev 2:10).

32.  “Children should be seen, not heard.” (in about 1450, there is an old English collection of “homilies” that says that young ladies should be seen, not heard)

Here are some resources I stole material from:

http://www.divinecaroline.com/self/self-discovery/that’s-not-bible-god-ground

Mary Saggies blog

The Phrase finder

As many of you know, I am passionate about the power and significance of Friendship.  I believe friendship trumps all earthly relationships – and, as Hunter points out, marriage is the ultimate version of it.  Hunter and her noble husband, Brooks, were students of mine in various ways over the years… You can read more by/about Hunter at  The Beless Family

Read and learn:

Friendship 101

Recently, I shared a conversation with a friend who is approaching the end of her freshman year in college. This isn’t the first time I’ve had this conversation, in fact, it’s one I’ve shared with quite a few freshman girls. Typically, our discussion begins with a description of her relationships, like her roommate(s), sorority sisters, boyfriend, or the friends she’s made in her dorm hall. As the conversation deepens we usually end up talking about how lonely she feels, even though she is surrounded by more people than ever before in her life. I listen with empathy, remembering my freshman year of college and what a stressful time that was for me emotionally & physically.

I had access to two heart friends from high school at the U of A [pictured during our sophomoreyear -- fortunately, we demolished all photo documentation from freshman year, as it is just too painful to recount], but I still struggled with feelings of loneliness as I walked through campus, attended classes of 200+ students, and sat in our sorority chapter meeting with my 74 pledge sisters that I couldn’t even call by name. I felt like a small fish in a really big pond. There were so many moments in which I struggled with feeling awkward, insecure, and out of place. The only place I wanted to be after my first semester of college at the University of Arkansas was back home.

Fast forward to the tail-end of spring semester, in which I felt better about life in Fayetteville & decided to live in my sorority house the next year, in hopes of developing friendships with my sorority sisters. There was a girl that served as our sorority chaplain [pictured right], who started a prayer group I attended with a few other women, including Elizabeth [formerly] Chenoweth [now] Seifried [pictured left]. These two asked if I would like to be their roommate in the Kappa house my sophomore year. I was stunned. I thought Sarah Baker [pictured right] was the most beautiful person I’d ever laid eyes on and Elizabeth Chenoweth [pictured left] was way out of my league socially. I mean, she even had her own Facebook group, “We Love Cheno,” which I am dismayed to report has since been deleted [yes, I tried linking it so you could all give it a thumb's up]. Anyway, why in the world would they want to room with me, the girl who hardly made it to chapter on a weekly basis? I still have no idea, but this began a sweet season of learning how to cultivate friendships.

You see, prior to college, my friends happened upon me without requiring a whole lot of added effort. Kristen, Sarah & I [remember them, the high school girlfriends I mentioned above?] had classes together for 5+ years, hung out in the same friend group, and over time our friendship developed, mostly out of the convenience of close proximity + common interests. Don’t get me wrong, I cherish their friendship deeply & they are still a part of my ‘inner circle,’ but I’m trying to communicate the reality that our friendship developed without putting in a lot of work.
That approach doesn’t really work with the amount of people + lack of time you have in college. You can only expend so much energy to so many people. Unfortunately, if you’re like me, you might not have experience cultivating friendship any other way.
While grieving with this college freshman over the fact that her friendships lacked depth, I had a bit of an epiphany. I suggested that she strive to become the kind of friend for which she is longing. That’s when it hit me: I didn’t really know how to be a friend or how to cultivate friendship either, until the Lord brought Elizabeth Chenoweth into my life. Elizabeth discipled me in the ways of friendship [and in a lot of other ways, but we will focus on this one today for the sake of trying to be concise]. I want to share a few things I learned from my friend, “Cheno” [that's what we called her back then & I can't seem to let it go yet, though she is now technically a Seifried] about being a friend.
1. Friendship requires devotion & devotion is a whole-hearted pursuit.
Elizabeth pursued [and continues to pursue] me. She left notes for me on my bed, on my desk, in my notebook, and on my computer. She made funny videos and posted them on my Facebook wall.  She even gave me a first-day-of-school present [it was an apple cutter and I donated it to the KKG house when we graduated, so now all of you girls know who that thing belongs to, hehe]. Elizabeth was devoted to being my friend, and she showed that to me in the way that she pursued me.
2. In order to be a friend, you must seek to know & be known.
Elizabeth was intentional about getting to know me. Living together helped tremendously, but she also took time to visit my family in Oklahoma with me. She invited me to tag along on her family vacations. She asked me questions and listened to the answers. Elizabeth knew my favorite snack, she knew I loved RVs & old people and that I love hate the sound of balloons bursting. In return, she shared her heart with me.
3. Friendship involves celebrating each other & recognizing each other as a gift from God.
This point builds on the latter, because in order to celebrate someone you must know them. Elizabeth celebrated me. Get this: on my birthday she blew up a photo of my face & wrote, “Wish this girl a happy birthday today!” & hung it up all over campus. She wrote “Happy Birthday!” signs on the sidewalk with chalk. I woke up to fresh donuts & blueberry coffee from my favorite breakfast joint in Fayetteville. And that is just one of many instances I could describe. Elizabeth spoke life into me. She was [and still is] one of my biggest fans. We knew that it was a gift to do life together and we communicated that to each other often.
4. Friendship involves service.
I literally had to make myself out of bed in the mornings when I lived with Cheno. If I didn’t, I kid you not, my bed would be made by the time I returned from my trip to the bathroom. She took out the trash, drove me to class, and lightly scratched my forearm because she knew I loved physical touch. Romans 12:10 says, “Outdo one another in showing honor.” Elizabeth did just that & I could hardly keep up with her.
I had the privilege of living with and cultivating friendship with Elizabeth for three years in college.  You know what’s funny? 8 hours south in College Station, TX there were two men named Brooks & Grant who were also college roommates for three years. To be honest, Brooks & Grant may have been even more intentional about cultivating friendship than Cheno & I were. I met Brooks through Pine Cove & he asked me on a date. A few weeks later Grant met Cheno [independent of Brooks & me] & he asked her on a date. Through a sequence of events most commonly known as dating and engagement the four of us ended up where we are today: best friends, married to best friends. Or maybe I should say, “couple best friends.” I’m not really sure about the wording, but here is what I am sure of: Elizabeth showed me what it looks like to cultivate a deep friendship & those principles have carried over into my marriage.
[Grant-Elizabeth-Me-Brooks]
I am now learning that marriage requires devotion, & devotion is a whole-hearted pursuit. To beone with your spouse you must know them & be known by them. That involves celebrating each other & recognizing that each of you are a gift from God. We are to serve each other in marriage as an expression of The Gospel & the service that God has extended to us through the Cross of His Son.
God made us to need & require friendship, and the ultimate expression of friendship is marriage. [Credit goes to Chris Legg for teaching that to me]. I am so grateful Elizabeth chose to ‘disciple me in the ways of friendship,’ as I didn’t really know how to cultivate & develop depth of friendship until she lived it out in front of me & showed me how to do it. The extension of her friendship to me has greatly impacted my life & my marriage. My hope is that you will be encouraged to bethe kind of friend that you desire, recognizing that ultimately, it is an expression of the ultimate friendship that has been extended to us in the Person of Jesus Christ.

Not in the Bible?

Here are some common phrases that are cited as from the Bible.  Pop quiz, hotshot… which ones are from the Bible, and which ones aren’t?  Feel free to copy and paste and put B for Bible or O for other.  Bonus for knowing where.

_____ 1.  “God helps those who helps themselves.”

_____ 2.  “Spare the rod, spoil the child.”

_____ 3.  “Cleanliness is next to Godliness.”

_____ 4.  “God works in mysterious ways.”

_____ 5.  “Pride goes before a fall.”

_____ 6.  “a fool and his money are soon parted.”

_____ 7.  “To thine own self be true.”

_____ 8.  “…beggars can’t be choosers.”

_____ 9.  “Money is root of all evil.”

_____ 10.  “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

_____ 11.  “…all things in moderation… “

_____ 12.  “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

_____ 13.  “The eye is the window to the soul.”

_____ 14.  “The lion will lie down with the lamb.”

_____ 15.  “Repent and sin no more…”

_____ 16.  The Seven deadly sins listed as wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony.

_____ 17.  “Charity begins at home.”

_____ 18.  “Honesty is the best policy.”

_____ 19.  “Love the sinner, hate the sin.”

_____ 20.  “Neither a borrower nor a lender be.”

_____ 21.  “The borrower is the servant of the lender.”

_____ 22.  “Don’t judge a book by its cover.”

_____ 23.  “Don’t let the right hand know what the left hand is doing.”

_____ 24.  “Forgive and forget.”

_____ 25.  “Practice what you preach.”

_____ 26.  “…better to reign in hell than serve in Heaven.”

_____ 27.  God is the “great physician.”

_____ 28.  “All men are created equal.”

_____ 29.  “A penny saved is a penny earned.”

_____ 30.  “Idle hands are the devils workshop.”

_____ 31.  “God’s will is the safest place to be…”

_____ 32.  “Children should be seen, not heard.”

In the recent Seminar for Men, I quickly referenced the different engagements with sexuality – erotic, illicit and intimate.

I have gotten questions about it, so, in preparation for the rest of the articles on “insights helpful to men into regards to communicating treasure-hood to their spouses through sexuality” (or some other equally subtle and well-thought out title).  The basics of what the treasure principle that I am talked about can be found at:  (http://chrismleggcounselor.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/a-new-treasure-principle/)

So, with no further ado:  Thoughts on the different facets of Experiencing Sexuality

There are at least two different ways to engage sexually… at least these two different ways of experiencing sex, and maybe three.

I have to start somewhere, so here is as good a place as any… First, a person can engage with sex in a way that is primarily erotic.

The Nature of the Erotic experience of Sexuality

I have already explained the Greek concept of eros, as I understand it, in the article about 5 different Greek words for love. (http://chrismlegg.com/2009/10/01/5-greek-words-for-love/).  In this usage, I am more closely aligning the word with our common modern English treatment, though the Greek certainly still applies.

In this expression or experience of sexuality, the sex is experienced for its own sake, and for the sake of the excitement, pleasure, and/or emotions of it.  One erotically engages with another person sexually in order to experience sex, and to receive (and give) the pleasure that can come with it.  There is nothing inherently wrong with this, so far as I can see, but it must be understood as limited…

…like icing… or candy… or dessert.   It can be a wonderful thing; but if someone tries to live on it, they will eat more and more and more and the more they eat, the more malnourished they become.  The erotic experience of sexuality is meant to be enjoyed, but it would be wise to remember that it doesn’t have the ability to nourish long term.  That is why if it is the only way that a person engages with sexuality, they always have to keep working at making it more, different, more extreme.   To reiterate yet again, there is nothing wrong with the erotic experience of sex any more than it is wrong to have dessert as a part of a meal.

There is, however,  a subheading under eros that is pretty much always based in sin…

… the illicit experience… the hidden, shameful, or guilty experience.  In fact, this can be one of the most powerful aspect of erotic sexual experiences.   Some people are addicted to it.  It is extremely powerful, but it is always short-lived.   This is the power of pornography, affairs, sometimes even just the pursuit stages of a relationship. 

It is toxic to a healthy sexual relationship.  In fact, this may explain why God’s Word calls for premarital abstinence… most early and virtually all pornographic expressions of sex are illicit in nature!  Hidden, shameful, abusive, selfish sexuality is common before marriage – especially in adolescence (or earlier), when most people experience “adult” sexuality for the first time.  If you suspect that you are somehow addicted to the illicit expression of sexuality, one great resource is http://www.pinegrovetreatment.com/.  Carnes is the expert on these issues.

Erotic sex is essentially what our culture understands, and virtually (and sometimes literally) worships.   Even though I believe that most of the erotic aspects of sex are a wonderful gift of God, like all things connected to the flesh, it has little power across time.  It must be re-fed in always newer and better ways… like food and drink.  When engaged with in wisdom, humility, and submission, they are sweet.  When made a part of the overall sense of nourishment, they are a wonderful pleasure… but when worshipped or idolized, they are eventually poison to the system.

I mentioned that this is the expression of sex that the World understands.  It prefers the illicit but understands the erotic.   One of the most clear evidences of this can be found in the world’s solutions to any sexual problems.

Grab any magazine from the checkout lines, or purchase a merely secular book on helping with sexual problems (don’t, by the way).  “Sixteen ways to spice up your sex life” on the cover of a women’s magazine will involve virtually nothing but new ways to bring more eros (like lingerie or something a little kinky) or even more often, illicit expressions of sexuality (pornography or other ways of involving other people).  The world’s assumption is:  if there is something wrong with your sex life, it must not be erotic or illicit enough.

That assumption, in my experience, is almost always inaccurate.

Generally, in my experience, when someone has a dissatisfactory experience of their sexual life, it is because they ONLY have illicit or even erotic expressions… so, to paraphrase the Apostle Paul, let me show you a more excellent way…  Next week about this time!

The other way that a person can experience sexuality is intimately.

If illicit sex is about experiencing the dark or shameful excitement of doing something “wrong” and erotic sexuality is about experiencing the joys of sex, then intimate sexuality is about experiencing  and knowing another person.

In the intimate expression of sex, the purpose of the sex is the most-complete possible engagement with your lover.  Your desire is for them… not primarily for sex.

Think of it this way:  I ask a bud to go throw the football.  He says “nah, I’m not really interested in throwing the football.”  Then I have two choices… I can say “ok, then I will find someone else who might be interested in tossing the football”… this choice would indicate that football was the interest – what was irreplaceable to me was football.  Obviously, with something like football, even if someone was as insecure about not being chosen as I am, they would probably be fine with it….

… or, I could say “well, then, bro, what would you like to do?”  In this, I would be making it clear that the intent of the request was getting time with the person.  The person is a priority over the activity, get it?

Intimacy is about knowing another person.  The more intimately I know them, the more I know what is going on inside of them – their thinking, ideas, beliefs, etc.  I think it is a mistake when speakers, pastors, etc. use “intimacy” as a euphemism for “sex.”  I think it is confusing.  Certainly two people  can have intimacy without it having anything at all to do with sexuality.  This confusion is another reason I wanted to write this article.

It is easy to see why or at least how the two got confused.  As its creator intended, sex is meant to be experienced intimately, and it also encourages intimacy.  It is meant to be intertwined with sex, like baptism and salvation for the Christian… however, they are not interchangeable and you certainly can have one without the other.  This unavoidable intertwining, I assume, is why “intimacy” has become a nice way of saying “sex”, but it leads to confusion… and God knows we don’t need any MORE confusion in this area.

There are some very significant consequences of the expression of intimate sexuality.  First, unlike erotic or illicit sex, it is an investment that grows.

One of the lies of modern psychology about marriage is that being good at sex (as a skill set, like skiing, or swimming) is important in marriage.  This MIGHT be true if every man or woman appreciated and enjoyed the same things sexually and in the same way.  However, they don’t.

I had some clients in the past who were both sex professionals… and they were married.  Why were they in counseling?  Because they were unable to enjoy the sex life that they wanted in their marriage.  Believe me, they had all the skills and experience they needed… and they looked like Greek gods.  Their eros meters must have been off of the chart.  However, as I said before, “generally, when someone has a dissatisfactory experience of their sexual life, it seems most often because they ONLY have illicit or even erotic expressions.”  Maybe this is part of why sexual experiences between future spouses before marriages often have to be healed as part of marriage counseling… maybe, but I don’t know.

The truth is that in marriage, the fulfillment is about intimacy, not sex… including in regards to sex. 

Make sense?

Again, maybe… maybe this is why people who have something of an expertise in sex aren’t more (in the anecdotal experience of this therapist) likely to have a great or satisfactory sexual aspect to their marriage; but, people with a “PhD” in their spouse do!

Hope for us:

All around us are examples of broken, shallow, empty, hopeless examples.  We have taken God’s great precious and valuable gift of sex, taken it out of its protective glass case of marriage and begun to treat it as common and cheap… a thrill of empty calories rather than a satiating meal of intimacy…

but all we need is the hope of it having been done well… a different kind of example…  A path worn well enough to follow.

I have one:  my grandparents were married 62 years before my grandfather died.  Few of us will ever know that kind of intimacy.  I don’t mean to be odd about this, but I assume that my 84 year old grandmother did not compete well in the erotic arena… but can you imagine how there would be no one on Earth capable of competing with her in the intimate arena?  And they didn’t have just time, but devotion, love, knowledge and passion.  My wife and I model our marriage after theirs.

As time passes and the “ravages” of age set in, our erotic power may fade… but our intimate investments can compound.  I am certain my grandfather would not have traded for any woman anywhere.

I have an example.

I intend to be another.

You?

Keep looking for more articles describing the rest of the teaching about sexuality that I went over at the Seminar.  My goal is that all of us be able to communicate to our wives (and families) that they are treasure.  I don’t want to leave sexuality out of that discussion.  If this is your first article to read, let me encourage you to go back to the Phalanx page and start the materials to men to start getting the complete picture.

For the ladies reading this as well, let me strongly recommend Shannon Ethridge’s book The Sexually Confident Wife  - it deals with many of the issues that keep women from enjoying a powerfully sexually intimate relationship with their husband!

Brother to Brother

Chris

Thoughts

I assume that for those intent on limiting legal availability to guns, it must be a moral argument.  But what is it?  I hope I get that feedback… if limited people’s lawful access to guns is a moral imperative to you, I would love to hear about it!  I am not kidding.  Remember, not pragmatic… moral.

 

but let me make a guess:

 

There are those who believe that humans are basically good… and because they are basically good, they believe that if you remove the external “evil” influences (like guns), then people will not be evil.  Maybe it is simpler than evil – maybe it is just “violent”…  If we take away the guns, then people will be less violent… in which case, it becomes a crusade to get rid of the evil or violent influencers.

 

The problem is that people are violent; more, people are evil… or at least tainted by it.  Though we have a wonderful potential for goodness and greatness that I assume extends from being created in the image of God…

 

But we are fallen.  We are bent from our original design.  We are all born with the predisposition to be selfish, narcissistic liars.  My children could lie before they had ever seen anyone lie – we didn’t have to teach them.

 

People will be violent and lethally so.  Those with evil or criminal intent will accomplish these and will do it with the best weapons they can get illegally.   To me it seems that for a sane society, it is vital that law abiding citizens be as well armed as criminals.  This feels axiomatic to me.

 

Maybe this isn’t it. If someone else has another moral argument, I would love to engage with it, but I don’t think a pragmatic one is going to work… and if a pragmatic argument doesn’t work, then it isn’t sound as a pragmatic argument.

 

Freedom

 

I do have one other thought that, as an American, has struck me recently as I have watched the news on these topics that I want to make note of… Again, I don’t know if I think of government endorsed freedom as a moral issue – my freedom comes from my Creator…

 

But one of the things that the US was originally founded on was a transcendent concept of human freedoms… that people are, generally speaking, free to choose things (like the pursuit of happiness) on their own.

 

One pundit after another is asking the same question about various gun components or brands or styles:  “Why do you need a __________?”

 

Silencer

AR-15

Extended clip

Pistol grip

Or whatever…

 

What troubles me is the question itself rather than the object… or even the answers.

 

Everyone that I have watched has been answering this question as thought it were a valid question.  As an American who likes to think of this as a free country, this bothers me.

 

Why do you need more than 1 car?

Why do you need to watch daytime news shows?

Why do you need dessert?

Why do you need more than 1 television?

Why do you need to own movies, computers, chairs, more than a couple changes of clothes, more than one pair of shoes…?

 

You don’t.  I don’t.

 

But this is a free nation, and approximates what the early founders would have believed that government was not supposed to do.

 

It seems to me that one application of that liberty would mean that it isn’t my responsibility to explain to the government why I want to own something… or why I need it…

 

Rather, it should be the government’s responsibility to go to extreme measures to make an airtight case that I shouldn’t have the freedom to own something…  and I think this was a part of the argument for our national existence.

 

Right?

 

Then why are we answering those questions?  I want to see an expert, pundit, or someone make this case when asked this question.  Has America changed so much that we don’t even start with the assumption of freedom?

 

Again, this is now still not a moral argument – I don’t know that I believe that people do have a God-given right to pursue happiness… but I do know it is a principle that the nation was founded on.  Interesting to me, at least, the shift in thinking.

 

Ok, I hope that didn’t become too political there at the end, but again, I am looking for what the moral argument might be and maybe it is about equitability.  For many, fairness is a moral responsibility… maybe I can write about fairness next.

Lesson Part II – what is meant by “Pragmatic” argument?

A pragmatic argument is one that is based on effectiveness… in other words, “what works?”

So, if what is left is the pragmatic argument, what, if anything, would gun control effectively accomplish?

First, I think I will stay away from statistics, because I am not sure whose numbers to trust.

All of that in place so I can start the actual discussion!  Whew.

So, I can only assume that proponents of gun control laws believe that creating laws that make owning or purchasing certain, or all, guns will make us safer… given the connection to the recent public shootings, that anti-gun laws will make things like that less likely.  That only seems plausible if one of two things is true:

1.  Gun laws will deter people with criminal intent from being willing to get and use guns… and/or

 

2.  Gun laws will deter people with criminal intent from being able to get and use guns. 

Again, if you believe that owning guns is morally wrong, I would love to hear about it… but if you are arguing for gun laws for practical reasons… am I missing something?  Those are the only two that make sense to me.

Also, PRO gun people might add “and then you would need to show that if either of those are true, then you would additionally have to show that people without the willingness and/or the ability to get and use guns for crime are this less likely to commit the crime another way (knife, club, fists, etc.) But I am not examining that yet.

So…

1.  Will gun laws deter criminals from being willing to get and use guns?

I think this argument borders on absurd and even self-refuting.

If someone is willing to commit burglary, kidnapping, or mass murder (all of which involved breaking a law – certainly with more legal penalty than breaking a gun law), then how would an additional law deter them?

Further, many crimes committed with guns are committed in places where gun laws are in effect.  Most of the recent and tragic mass shootings, for example, were in areas where having the firearm was illegal.  In that case, the gun law did not deter the person.

Am I missing something?  Is there someone out there who can help me understand that aspect of the argument?

2.  Will gun laws deter criminals from being able to get and use guns?

I can see one narrow way in which this could be accurate.

If the general number of guns in society goes down and guns become more rare over time in a general way, or at least in the sphere of access of a potential criminal, then it is conceivable that the ease of acquiring a gun could go down in an individual case.   In a specific situation I can imagine a case in which an individual would be slowed down… but that could still be the case if guns were legal.

However, I don’t see that this would, in an general way, reduce those with criminal intent being able to get guns.  Are there ANY examples of that?

For decades many drugs have been illegal and I don’t think they are any less accessible because of it.  We declared war on drugs, but I am not aware of any evidence that they are less available to those intent with getting them.  Except in extremely rare and potentially fictional situation, I don’t see how limited legal access to guns will they be meaningfully less accessible to those with criminal intent.

If gun laws are not likely to make those with criminal intent less willing or less able to get them to use in their criminal endeavors, then why limit the freedom of law abiding citizens?

Still more thoughts to follow in regards to this kind of thinking… and maybe to answer some of these questions that aren’t as rhetorical and we often think… next time.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,101 other followers