New Big Bang Research – Part I

“It takes essentially nothing to create a universe.” Alan Guth

Years ago, I read in a physics textbook a confession by a popular physicists (sadly, I cannot find the book or remember the author’s name) from the 1950’s. He remembered that the secular physicists of the time were very concerned as it was becoming more and more clear that the universe started suddenly and not outrageously slowly as had been theorized up until that time.

The concern was that the theists were going to, figuratively speaking, rub their noses in it. After all, theists of most stripes have said that the universe came into existence in an instant. In the Judeo-Christian heritage, God spoke the universe into existence.
The author also noted that the secular physicists sighed a collective sigh of relief when the Christians, in particular, came out in immediate and rabid (my word) hatred of the “Big Bang” theory.

It was not for a while before someone was smart enough to realize the correlation and create the famous (infamous?) bumper sticker “God spoke and BANG the universe existed.” bumper sticker

It is my hope that a day will come when Christians will stop reacting ignorantly to scientific input.
All truth is God’s truth. If there is a God, He is the ultimate source for everything, including truth.

Even if a blind squirrel finds a nut, it is still a nut.

Even if a secular, God-hating person uncovers something that is true, it is still true.
Let’s learn to stop forwarding emails without checking for their veracity and accuracy. Let’s become educated enough in regards to biology, physics and reality to stop making mistakes like building whole arguments on misunderstandings of things even basic scientific understandings like Laws of Thermodynamics.

Let’s let our opponents make arguments from blindness or ignorance. If you do not know what you are talking about, it is ok to not talk.

Now, I want to report on further developments from some top scientists (one of whom is a raving anti-theist and especially anti-Christian).
Then, if you are a theist, enjoy that scientists are finding evidence that is what we should have predicted that they would find. Does this prove we are right – That God obviously exists?

Of course not, but it sure is a cool thing when even secular science reports precisely what a Creationist (not an age of the Earth theory, just a source theory) would have predicted.
From “Science Friday”… on March 21, 2014 Alan Guth, Lawrence Krauss, and John Kovac were interviewed about the new input on the expansion of the universe.

I am hesitant to give direct credit for each quote since it is often difficult on the audio to tell who is always speaking. I will guess with confidence when I am pretty sure, but please excuse me if I get the wrong professor/researcher.

The new data is referenced as “…almost unimaginable.” I would imagine so, given that a purely naturalistic perspective would make this information tough to swallow.

This research was about what was going on, to quote Krauss, when the universe was “10-35 seconds old …essentially the beginning of time.”

Christian theologians have presented that God created time – that there was a “when” that precedes the movement of time, at least as we understand it. Krauss, at least, seems to agree with that theory.

So far so good.
But the coolest stuff came later in the interview.  Next week.  You are gonna love this.

9 thoughts on “New Big Bang Research – Part I

  1. All that buildup and you leave it there? Lol. Looking forward to the rest next week.

  2. Come on man! What a tease! I have to wait till next week? Great thoughts. I’m actually teaching about the scientific revolution in and the early scientists use of “dual revelation” whereby God reveals himself through his general revelation (creation) and special revelation (scripture, prophets, Jesus). I think when the evangelical community chose to scorn the Big Bang model they are making the same mistake the early church did in hanging on to their interpretation of scripture supporting a geocentric cosmology (ie Psalm 19). Some would say the trial of Galileo and subsequent bad blood decimated the credibility of the Church in the process. I see a lot of parallels in the Big Bang debate within evangelical circles.
    Galileo said it best when he said Sacred Scripture cannot err, but many who choose to interpret and expound upon it can, and do. When the special and general revelation seem to be in conflict then your interpretation of one or the other is flawed.

  3. Chris,
    Have you ever read Worlds in Collison by Immanuel Velikovsky? From what I can discern, he was not a Christian but inflamed the scientific community by proving things happened as the Bible said they did. I read something on him in a ReadersDigest that I thought was really cool – but I haven’t wanted to spend the money on his book yet.
    http://tmgnow.com/repository/secret/velikovsky2.html
    Don
    Don Self & Associates, Inc
    305 Senter Ave, Whitehouse, TX 75791 903 871-1172 fax 480-247-5650 donself@donself.com web: http://www.donself.com check out my book & webinars at https://shop.donself.com
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.